
Nursing Informatics
1. Nursing Informatics. Why might the use of health IT product Limitations potentially inhibit the user’s ability to see the “big picture” of the patient? What about accessing, viewing, and using the electronic health record (EHR) makes it a different user experience from that of using traditional hard-copy patient charts and records?
2. Why might the use of health IT products might potentially inhibit the user’s ability to see the “big picture” of the patient? What is it about accessing, viewing, and using the electronic health record (EHR) that makes it a different user experience from that of using traditional hard-copy patient charts and records
Criteria 1
Meets Expectations
18 points
Partially Meets Expectations
12 points
Below Expectations
6 points
Criterion Score
Initial Post
18 to 13 points
Addresses assigned questions with a demonstration of critical thinking/clinical judgment (6 points)
Develops at least 5 substantial facts in 250-300 words; (6 pts)
Applies concepts to nursing practice. (6 pts)
12 to 7 points
Answers to questions are incomplete, and critical thinking/clinical judgment need improvement
Post includes < 5 well-developed facts, <250 words
Some application to nursing practice.
6 to 0 points
Answers to questions are incomplete, and critical thinking/clinical judgment needs improvement
Post includes less than <3 well-developed facts, <150 words
Minimal application to nursing practice
Score of Initial Post,
/ 18
Criteria 2
Meets Expectations
18 points
Partially Meets Expectations
12 points
Below Expectations
6 points
Criterion Score
Peer Reply Post
18 to 13 points
Replies to at least two peers; demonstrate critical thinking/clinical judgement (6 pts)
Develops total of at least 5 substantial facts or questions in total of 250-300 words (6 pts)
Applies concepts to nursing practice. (6 pts).
12 to 7 points
Replies to one peer OR replies need more substance, critical thinking/clinical judgement needs improvement.
Total replies include < 5 well-developed facts/questions, <250 words
Some application to nursing practice.
6 to 0 points
Replies need more substance, and critical thinking/clinical judgement needs improvement.
Replies include less than <3 well-developed facts, <150 words
Minimal application to nursing practice.
A score of Peer Reply Post,
/ 18
Criteria 3
Meets Expectations
4 points
Partially Meets Expectations
2 points
Below Expectations
0 points
Criterion Score
References
4 points
Includes at least one reference with matching in-text citations in the initial post and in both peer response posts.
2 points
Includes a reference with matching in-text citations in the initial post or in a peer response post, or is missing in-text citations.
0 points
Does not include references or is missing in-text citations.
Score of References,
/ 4
Criteria 4
Meets Expectations
5 points
Partially Meets Expectations
3 points
Below Expectations
0 points
Criterion Score
Participation
5 points
Completes an initial post by the Wednesday at 2359 of the assigned week and peer reply posts by Sunday at 2359; the posts are completed on 2 different days of the week.
3 points
Completes an initial post by the Wednesday of the assigned week and peer reply posts by assigned dates but does not post on 2 different days of the week.
0 points
Does not complete an initial post assigned date and peer reply posts by due dates
Score of Participation,
/ 5
Criteria 5
Meets Expectations
5 points
Partially Meets Expectations
4 points
Below Expectations
0 points
Criterion Score
APA, Spelling, Grammatical Errors & Netiquette Issues
5 points
No APA, spelling, or grammatical errors, nor netiquette issues in the posts.
4 to 1 points
Has minimal to moderate (1 to 4) APA, spelling, grammatical errors, or netiquette issues in the posts.
0 points
Has >4 APA, spelling, or grammatical errors or netiquette issues in the posts.
Score of APA, Spelling, Grammatical Errors & Netiquette Issues,
/ 5
Total
Score of Discussion Rubric,
/ 50
Overall Score
Total
0 points minimum
